hi everyone,
I write here to ask about the possibility to have a 64-bits compiled version for Windows.
It's possible ? is there any problem in the dependecies?
thanks in advanced,
64-bits compiled version of z88dk
I though it was, but it seems not!
I don't have a particular preference regarding 32/64 on Windows. I'm guessing that most people have moved on from XP so we switch easily enough - we've been building zsdcc in 64 bit mode for at least 18 months.
I've just done a test build in 64 bit and everything seems to be ok so I'll switch over - let me know how the nightly works for you.
I don't have a particular preference regarding 32/64 on Windows. I'm guessing that most people have moved on from XP so we switch easily enough - we've been building zsdcc in 64 bit mode for at least 18 months.
I've just done a test build in 64 bit and everything seems to be ok so I'll switch over - let me know how the nightly works for you.
Hi dom
Until now I did not care if the windows version of z88dk was 32 or 64. But recently I have tried the tup tool (http://gittup.org/tup/) , used to parallelize compilations and to cache results.
However, in my tests I found a bug where, using 32-based applications (as the zcc.exe), it is not able to detect changes over the modified sources. You can find more detail in this issue: https://github.com/gittup/tup/issues/401
And I think it may be one more reason to have the 64 version available :-D
kind regards,
Until now I did not care if the windows version of z88dk was 32 or 64. But recently I have tried the tup tool (http://gittup.org/tup/) , used to parallelize compilations and to cache results.
However, in my tests I found a bug where, using 32-based applications (as the zcc.exe), it is not able to detect changes over the modified sources. You can find more detail in this issue: https://github.com/gittup/tup/issues/401
And I think it may be one more reason to have the 64 version available :-D
kind regards,
Normally I wouldn't be quite so gungho about it. However, the zsdcc build has been 64 bit for over a year and I've not seen any issues being raised about it.
From this one of the following is I suppose true?
- There are no 32 bit windows users
- 32 bit windows users don't use zsdcc
I'd rather not turn on 32 bit builds again - for both disc space and time reasons - but will do if there's demand.
I will however drop a note in the activity forum so there's a record of it.
From this one of the following is I suppose true?
- There are no 32 bit windows users
- 32 bit windows users don't use zsdcc
I'd rather not turn on 32 bit builds again - for both disc space and time reasons - but will do if there's demand.
I will however drop a note in the activity forum so there's a record of it.